Accepted papers now appear online as citable Articles in Press with permanent DOIs, reshaping how quickly peer-reviewed ...
Reviewer 1: “This manuscript is a timely and important contribution to the field, with clear methodology and compelling results. I recommend publication with only minor revisions.” Reviewer 2: “This ...
When it comes to peer review, contradiction is common. One reviewer may praise the work, while another sees nothing but issues or seems to miss the point. However, these disagreements are part of the ...
Papers with publicly available peer-review reports are less likely to be retracted than are those without public reports, a study has found. The authors say this could, in some cases, reflect greater ...
Should researchers be paid to review papers? The question has long been fiercely debated. Now, a study has uncovered an apparent market for peer review, operating through third-party firms that offer ...
Background: The public gets most of its information about genetic research from the media. It has been suggested that media representations may involve exaggeration, called “genohype.” To examine the ...
Doctoral theses at the Faculty of Humanities have traditionally been monographs, but they may also be compilations of several peer-reviewed scholarly publications and manuscripts accepted for ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results